Censorship is contractionary

I was at SAM@8Q this evening. An artist had put up an exhibition featuring the rare book collection of the museum and invited museum-goers to select books to withdraw from public access – essentially banning them.

Withdrawn is nice euphemism. There’s a sublime sense of clinical emotionlessness and highbrow thoughtfulness that surrounds it and permeates it.

Capturing an almost Orwellian-like totalitarian-bureaucratic zeitgeist, there was a pile of “withdrawn” books, all nicely cling-wrapped with a personally written card delineating the reasons for its withdrawal. Some of these books had threaded on feminist sensitivities, others on tightly-held personal ideologies on life. A few witty ones included a “withdrawn” copy of the arts council’s annual cultural statistics with the reason as “culture can never be measured in numbers”.

I submitted a withdrawal form for a poetry book on the grounds that “poetry is a luxury we cannot afford”. Lee Kuan Yew would agree wholeheartedly with me.

IMG_5368 (1)

Beside the pile of withdrawn books is a neatly arranged shelf of books donated by museum-goers, all tagged with little blue forms filled with reasons why those books are good for general consumption. It was a painfully puny shelf.

Censorship is contractionary. Where knowledge expands, censorships encroaches. Books are subversive and reading is radical.

IMG_5371 (1)



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: